|
|
|
Home |
The Jester’s
Quart
January 19, 2007
The Jester's Quart: The Booze, Banter and Betting Theory
David Beckham's arrival in Hollywood is an important moment
in the history of Major League Soccer, but not THE most important moment.
That's yet to happen.
No, THE most important moment will occur when a player of Beckham's star power,
history and ability comes to MLS and the first 25 questions asked aren't
centered around his impact on television ratings, gate receipts and the chances
that one of the other four Spice Girls might show up in the owner's box during a
game.
THE most important moment will be when the first question asked is, "What does
this mean for the Galaxy on the field and its chances for winning a
championship?"
What MLS lacks is banter. Between fans. On sports radio. The kind of intense
discussion of its teams and their game that fuels daily conversations about
other sports. That's not to say that there isn't a significant percentage of
American soccer fans who understand the sport to the point where they can hold
an informed debate about who should be playing where on the pitch, and what one
coaching decision could mean for an entire match - I just don't think there's
enough of them out there for this conversation to be even close to being
mainstream.
I mean, how many casual American soccer fans even know what Beckham's position
in Los Angeles will be...well, you know, other than "Posh on top?"
What soccer lacks in banter, it makes up for in other areas. I've been giving
this some thought lately, and wanted to toss this out to you good readers:
The Booze, Banter and Betting
Theory.

I believe a sport's popularity, on a professional or college level, can be
directly linked to its fans' ability to debate it, bet it, or use it as the
entrance point for a few hours of total inebriation.
In other countries, soccer has the trifecta. Fans can endlessly rant and rave
about their favorite teams and players because they have an intrinsic
understanding of the sport akin to American's ingrained comprehension of
baseball. I'm pretty sure there's a question about the infield fly rule on the
U.S. citizenship test.
And where do international soccer fans, especially in Europe and South America,
hold most of these discussions? In the friendly confines of a neighborhood pub,
bar or watering hole, of course. Because what is soccer if not a reason to pound
Guinness or Dos Equis in-between infrequent goals?
The relative lack of offense in soccer is, of course, one of the reasons why it
has trouble meeting the third condition of The Booze, Banter and Betting Theory,
which according to my watch is "betting." Unless you're getting odds on who will
win a tournament, you're betting a money-line on an individual match. This used
to really suck back in the days when there would be only three choices on a
wager: home win, road win or draw. Over the years, tie games started to become
pushes, making the wagers a little less dangerous to the better. Still, it's not
the greatest sport to bet. So, in the end, The Booze, Banter and Betting Theory
score for soccer would be - on a scale graded 1 (as bad as Marty Schottenheimer
in a NFL playoff game) to 10 (as good as Adam Vinatieri in a NFL playoff game):
BOOZE: 10
BANTER: 4
BETTING: 3
What about the rest of sports
in America?

FOOTBALL: The NFL and
college football are an undeniable heaven-on-Earth for drunks and degenerate
gamblers, and especially for drunk degenerate gamblers. Tailgating culture
started with football Saturdays and Sundays. Sports bars now build their weekend
schedules around the array of flat screen TVs on the walls. And it remains the
easiest, and most popular, sport to bet, from bookie slips to office Super Bowl
grids. Trust me when I tell you that 140 million people aren't tuning in to see
Prince play halftime next month.
Banter is where football falters a little bit, and I'll tell you why: The
quarterback. I have Sirius Radio, and I listen to its all-NFL channel with some
frequency. Every third caller is some yokel slamming the hell out of his
quarterback for everything from a botched fourth-and-one play to the price of
popcorn at the stadium. I think football fans have a nice handle on game-to-game
dissection of individual moments and plays; when it comes to the overall picture
of how to build a winning football team, I think they're slightly less informed
than Dan Snyder.
BOOZE: 10
BANTER: 6
BETTING: 10

BASEBALL: Baseball has
its own tailgating culture and certainly has its share of infamously boozy
crowds (see Field, Wrigley). But the minute they banned beer sales in the
bleachers at Yankee Stadium is the minute its score dropped like an Ohio State
player's stock in the NFL Draft.
Betting? Don't waste my time. The betting line for a Major League Baseball game
looks like a data printout from a NASA Supercomputer. The only way it could be
more confusing is if John Kerry read it aloud.
But Banter is where baseball destroys every other sport, not only for the
near-total understanding of the game by the majority of its fans but because of
the comparative history that goes along with it. Any sport where you can
literally spend two weeks debating the Randy Johnson trade, while at the same
time dissecting Mark McGwire's Hall of Fame creds, has the Banter thing down.
Not to mention a winter's worth of Hot Stove League chatter.
BOOZE: 6
BANTER: 10
BETTING: 2

BASKETBALL: Not
exactly a drinking man's sport. Too much action, too much leaping, not enough
down time. That's why student sections at college games are always hopping up
and down - to try and level off their beer-goggled vision before they spew all
over the mascot.
Betting the NBA sort of blows because there are too many variables and too many
points scored. Betting college basketball, however, has established March
Madness as an annual must-see event. If the Super Bowl is a bettor's Christmas,
the NCAA Tournament is Thanksgiving.
Banter has the historical comparisons of baseball - how many "the next Jordan"
debates have you taken part in? - but doesn't have the same on-the-court
conversational value as other sports. Too few players, too few scenarios and a
salary cap in the NBA that impedes nearly any kind of significant hot stove
rumor mongering.
BOOZE: 3
BANTER: 7
BETTING: 7

HOCKEY: I once did
tequila shots on a bus with a hockey fan club before arriving at a sports bar
for more drinks, getting back on the bus for more shots and then arriving at a
game for more beer.
I've also seen plenty of punches thrown in the stands, but hardly ever a full
beverage. There's a reason for that.
Betting hockey has become easier now that ties have been eliminated - Gee, you
don't think that was a factor in establishing a skills competition as a way to
end games, do you? - but it's still a hard sport to bet because so many games
end in one or two goals.
Banter is an interesting thing for hockey fans, mostly because the majority of
it deals with what the men in charge are doing to bastardize the game. (Changing
the jerseys? I mean, c'mon.) When it comes to the game itself, I think the die
hards understand the sport very well, and can debate everything from who should
play on the checking line to the need for a left-handed center on face-offs. The
problem with die-hard hockey fans - and I'm one of them - is that we don't
necessarily trust that the person we're talking to is into the sport as deeply
as we are. (At least that's been my experience, and the experience of other
American hockey fans I've spoken to.) There's a load of difference between
debating Crosby vs. Ovechkin and debating who should be playing with them as a
right-handed point shot on the power play; it's a level of hockey geekdom some
of us either don't believe exists in other more "casual" fans or are unwilling
to accept exists in us.
BOOZE: 9
BANTER: 4
BETTING: 3

GOLF: I wanted one
more sport to round out the field, and it was either this, tennis or NASCAR.
Tennis Banter is at an all-time low, with Page 6 rumors more prevalent than any
concrete conversation about the game. NASCAR is a drinking sport, but Betting
and Banter are mysteries to me; do fans really debate who's in the pit crew and
things like that? I mean, seriously...
Golf, however, is an underrated sport for Betting and Booze. While some may bet
on PGA events, I think most of the wagering - just like most of the drinking -
happens on the greens between foursomes.
As for Banter, there might be some good discussions about individual events and
holes every week. But if Tiger doesn't win in four tournaments and someone asks,
"What's wrong with Tiger?", I doubt the answer will be informed, insightful, or
anywhere near interesting as it would be for other sports.
BOOZE: 6
BANTER: 6
BETTING: 6
So there you have it. Not exactly a scientific study, but I
think it offers some insight as to why some sports thrive through the
generations while others are perpetually stuck in neutral.
I think one of the glorious things about sports - and in turn The Booze, Banter
and Betting Theory - is that depending on where you live, who you root for and
who you root with, it all can fluctuate greatly.
And with that, I'm headed to Jersey to have a beer, bitch about the Jets and bet
on the AFC title game with my dad...
Get Greg Wyshynski's new book,
"Glow Pucks & 10-Cent Beer: The 101 Worst Ideas in Sports History,"
available in stores and online now!
"The only folks who won't like this book are employers, whose employees will spend the day around the water cooler arguing over which idea was worse: the overtime shootout or Disco Demolition Night. Just as I had successfully eliminated some of these horrendous sports ideas from my memory bank, here comes Greg Wyshynski putting 'em on a tee, inviting readers to take a swing. Great stuff." -- Ernie Johnson, TNT's "Inside the NBA" |
Add
This Column To Your Site for free
Published on the web and www.SportsFanMagazine.com since 1997, "The Jester's Quart" is a weekly satirical look at sports, pop culture and why NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman is a jackass. Columnist Greg Wyshynski is the Senior Editor for SportsFan Magazine in Washington DC, and the Senior Sports Editor for The Connection Newspapers of Northern Virginia. His book "Glow Pucks and 10-Cent Beer: The 101 Worst Ideas in Sports History" can be ordered now. Email Wyshynski at jestersquart@hotmail.com.
| Archives | |
|
2007:
Why Brees, Mangini Deserve NFL Honors |
|