Is boxing losing popularity due to the rise of mixed
martial arts? In my opinion, the answer is a resounding no. The
reasons are simple - both sports are very different, have different core
audiences, and have different talent pools.For all of their superficial
similarities - punches thrown, gloves worn, and often violent conclusions,
boxing and MMA are each fought under disparate sets of rules. In boxing,
fighters use their hands punches only) as weapons, fight
three-minute rounds, and can only fight for a maximum of 12 rounds based on
the unified rules of boxing commissions. In MMA, fighters can use their
hands (punches and grappling) and legs (kicks and grappling)
as weapons, fight five-minute rounds, and can only fight a maximum of five
rounds based on ultimate championship fighting rules. The rules could not be
any more different.
Although both boxing and MMA have a similar appeal based on the combative
nature of each sport and both attract largely male demographics, they have
very distinct core audiences. In recent years, boxing has become
more of a niche sport - supported by communities and countries where the
sport is a pastime (e.g. Mexico, the Philippines and Puerto Rico) and
dedicated die-hards like me who have continued to follow the sport despite
its declining national popularity. MMA, on the other hand, is supported by a
mixed bag of sorts. While it does have its share of "boxing defectors,"
MMA's audience is a hodgepodge of fans of martial arts, kick-boxing, and
even, so-called "professional wrestling." Right now, the fan base is also
not as diverse as boxing's, but that will surely change as the popularity
grows.
Fighters are cut from the same cloth, right? This is not true, when it
comes to boxing and MMA. Today, boxing's best and brightest stars still come
largely from depressed or hard-scrabble communities, both rural and urban,
as has been the case for decades. The only difference now is that many of
the top fighters come from countries across the globe, as many Americans
from humble beginnings no longer see boxing as their "athletic path to
success." As a result, you are just as likely to see a Ring champion crowned
from such fertile boxing soil as Cuba or the Ukraine - foreign lands where
boxing is still a pastime and many of its citizens still view the sweet
science as an "athletic path to success." While it would appear that
becoming an MMA fighter is a decision that is driven by similar (limited)
opportunities that push many men to become boxers, the reality is far
different. Many practitioners of MMA are former college wrestlers,
globetrotting martial artists, or former well-paid professional wrestlers,
who often have college degrees and other career options which belie their
profession.
As you can see, comparing boxing to MMA is understandable on the surface,
but downright silly upon further inspection. To the untrained eye, boxing
and MMA are eerily similar sports on a collision course for the hearts and
minds of fight fans everywhere. However, I do not see it that way. In fact,
I think this ongoing debate will only lead to the increased popularity of
both sports.